7 6 2015 Actin 4 qPCR

After noting some significant discrepancies between replicates last week we decided to change the protocol to better help optimize the process and make the data more consistent between runs. Today I'm running two replicates of Actin but this post will only cover the second one. You can read about the other run here. 

Primers:

1505	Ol_Act_F	GACCAGCCAAATCCAGACGA	BC	6/13/2012	20	55	60	O.lurida	Actin, adductor muscle
1504	Ol_Act_R	CGGTCGTACCACTGGTATCG		6/13/2012	20	60	60	O.lurida	Actin, adductor muscle

To help with optimization I made a 1:9 dilution of cDNA so that pipette error would not affect the concentrations as much as it has previously. 

Reagent Table:

	Volume	Reactions X58
Ssofast Evagreen MM	10	580
FWD Primer	0.5	29
REV Primer	0.5	29
1:9 cDNA	9

1. Added reagents from greatest to least volume
2. Vortexed
3. Centrifuged briefly
4. Pipetted 11 ul Master Mix to each tube
5. Pipetted 9 ul of 1:9 cDNA each column using a channel pipetter
6. Centrifuged plate at 2000 rpm for 1 minute
7. Ran Program Below

Program:

Step	Temperature	Time
Initiation	95 C	10 min
Elongation	95 C	30 sec
	60 C	1 min
Read
	72 C	30 sec
Read
Repeat Elongation 39 times
Termination	95 C	1 min
	55 C	1 sec
Melt Curve Manual ramp 0.2C per sec Read 0.5 C	55 - 95 C	30 sec
	21 C	10 min
End

Plate Layout:

1	2	3	4	5	6	7
DNased 42215 HC1	DNased 42215 NC1	DNased 42215 SC1	DNased 42215 HT1 1	DNased 42215 NT1 1	DNased 42215 ST1 1	NTC
DNased 42215 HC2	DNased 42215 NC2	DNased 42215 SC2	DNased 42215 HT1 2	DNased 42215 NT1 2	DNased 42215 ST1 2	NTC
DNased 42215 HC3	DNased 42215 NC3	DNased 42215 SC3	DNased 42215 HT1 3	DNased 42215 NT1 3	DNased 42215 ST1 3	NTC
DNased 42215 HC4	DNased 42215 NC4	DNased 42215 SC4	DNased 42215 HT1 4	DNased 42215 NT1 4	DNased 42215 ST1 4	NTC
DNased 42215 HC5	DNased 42215 NC5	DNased 42215 SC5	DNased 42215 HT1 5	DNased 42215 NT1 5	DNased 42215 ST1 5
DNased 42215 HC6	DNased 42215 NC6	DNased 42215 SC6	DNased 42215 HT1 6	DNased 42215 NT1 6	DNased 42215 ST1 6
DNased 42215 HC7	DNased 42215 NC7	DNased 42215 SC7	DNased 42215 HT1 7	DNased 42215 NT1 7	DNased 42215 ST1 7
DNased 42215 HC8	DNased 42215 NC8	DNased 42215 SC8	DNased 42215 HT1 8	DNased 42215 NT1 8	DNased 42215 ST1 8

Results:

All Samples

NTCs

The samples look good from this run. The appear to both have the same primer dimer issue in the NTCs and the runs look roughly similar. Now I need to compare the two runs with each other to see how closely the Ct's match. I'll post a work up soon on how I did this in R. 

7 6 2015 Actin qPCR rerun

After noting some significant discrepancies between replicates last week we decided to change the protocol to better help optimize the process and make the data more consistent between runs. Today I'm running two replicates of Actin but this post will only cover the first one.

Primers:

1505	Ol_Act_F	GACCAGCCAAATCCAGACGA	BC	6/13/2012	20	55	60	O.lurida	Actin, adductor muscle
1504	Ol_Act_R	CGGTCGTACCACTGGTATCG		6/13/2012	20	60	60	O.lurida	Actin, adductor muscle

To help with optimization I made a 1:9 dilution of cDNA so that pipette error would not affect the concentrations as much as it has previously. 

Reagent Table:

	Volume	Reactions X58
Ssofast Evagreen MM	10	580
FWD Primer	0.5	29
REV Primer	0.5	29
1:9 cDNA	9

1. Added reagents from greatest to least volume
2. Vortexed
3. Centrifuged briefly
4. Pipetted 11 ul Master Mix to each tube
5. Pipetted 9 ul of 1:9 cDNA each column using a channel pipetter
6. Centrifuged plate at 2000 rpm for 1 minute
7. Ran Program Below

Program:

Step	Temperature	Time
Initiation	95 C	10 min
Elongation	95 C	30 sec
	60 C	1 min
Read
	72 C	30 sec
Read
Repeat Elongation 39 times
Termination	95 C	1 min
	55 C	1 sec
Melt Curve Manual ramp 0.2C per sec Read 0.5 C	55 - 95 C	30 sec
	21 C	10 min
End

Plate Layout:

1	2	3	4	5	6	7
DNased 42215 HC1	DNased 42215 NC1	DNased 42215 SC1	DNased 42215 HT1 1	DNased 42215 NT1 1	DNased 42215 ST1 1	NTC
DNased 42215 HC2	DNased 42215 NC2	DNased 42215 SC2	DNased 42215 HT1 2	DNased 42215 NT1 2	DNased 42215 ST1 2	NTC
DNased 42215 HC3	DNased 42215 NC3	DNased 42215 SC3	DNased 42215 HT1 3	DNased 42215 NT1 3	DNased 42215 ST1 3	NTC
DNased 42215 HC4	DNased 42215 NC4	DNased 42215 SC4	DNased 42215 HT1 4	DNased 42215 NT1 4	DNased 42215 ST1 4	NTC
DNased 42215 HC5	DNased 42215 NC5	DNased 42215 SC5	DNased 42215 HT1 5	DNased 42215 NT1 5	DNased 42215 ST1 5
DNased 42215 HC6	DNased 42215 NC6	DNased 42215 SC6	DNased 42215 HT1 6	DNased 42215 NT1 6	DNased 42215 ST1 6
DNased 42215 HC7	DNased 42215 NC7	DNased 42215 SC7	DNased 42215 HT1 7	DNased 42215 NT1 7	DNased 42215 ST1 7
DNased 42215 HC8	DNased 42215 NC8	DNased 42215 SC8	DNased 42215 HT1 8	DNased 42215 NT1 8	DNased 42215 ST1 8

Results:

All Samples

NTCs

The samples look good. The NTCs did have amplification but it appears that it was primer dimers and nothing else. I'm running another plate over night and I'll post about it tomorrow as well as how the two replicates match. 

You can see the raw data file here.

7 1 2015 TLR rep qPCR

Yesterday I reran the TLR replicate to help alleviate the NTC deviancy that we saw with an earlier replicate run.

Primers:

1630	TLR2.1_FWD	ACAAAGATTCCACCCGGCAA	JH	5/21/2015	20	55		O.lurida	Toll-like receptor 2 type-1	Q9DD78
1629	TLR2.1_REV	ACACCAACGACAGGAAGTGG	JH	5/21/2015	20	55		O.lurida	Toll-like receptor 2 type-1	Q9DD78

Reagent Table:

	Volume	Reactions X58
Ssofast Evagreen MM	10	580
FWD Primer	0.5	29
REV Primer	0.5	29
Nuclease Free H2O	8	464
cDNA	1

1. Added reagents from greatest to least volume
2. Vortexed
3. Centrifuged briefly
4. Pipetted 19 ul Master Mix to each tube
5. Pipetted appropriate cDNA sample to each tube
6. Centrifuged plate at 2000 rpm for 1 minute
7. Ran Program Below

Program:

Step	Temperature	Time
Initiation	95 C	10 min
Elongation	95 C	30 sec
	60 C	1 min
Read
	72 C	30 sec
Read
Repeat Elongation 39 times
Termination	95 C	1 min
	55 C	1 sec
Melt Curve Manual ramp 0.2C per sec Read 0.5 C	55 - 95 C	30 sec
	21 C	10 min
End

Plate Layout:

1	2	3	4	5	6	7
DNased 42215 HC1	DNased 42215 NC1	DNased 42215 SC1	DNased 42215 HT1 1	DNased 42215 NT1 1	DNased 42215 ST1 1	NTC
DNased 42215 HC2	DNased 42215 NC2	DNased 42215 SC2	DNased 42215 HT1 2	DNased 42215 NT1 2	DNased 42215 ST1 2	NTC
DNased 42215 HC3	DNased 42215 NC3	DNased 42215 SC3	DNased 42215 HT1 3	DNased 42215 NT1 3	DNased 42215 ST1 3	NTC
DNased 42215 HC4	DNased 42215 NC4	DNased 42215 SC4	DNased 42215 HT1 4	DNased 42215 NT1 4	DNased 42215 ST1 4	NTC
DNased 42215 HC5	DNased 42215 NC5	DNased 42215 SC5	DNased 42215 HT1 5	DNased 42215 NT1 5	DNased 42215 ST1 5
DNased 42215 HC6	DNased 42215 NC6	DNased 42215 SC6	DNased 42215 HT1 6	DNased 42215 NT1 6	DNased 42215 ST1 6
DNased 42215 HC7	DNased 42215 NC7	DNased 42215 SC7	DNased 42215 HT1 7	DNased 42215 NT1 7	DNased 42215 ST1 7
DNased 42215 HC8	DNased 42215 NC8	DNased 42215 SC8	DNased 42215 HT1 8	DNased 42215 NT1 8	DNased 42215 ST1 8

Results:

All Samples

NTCs

So it looks like there is a deviancy again in 2/4 NTCs. This is distressing as it keeps happening. The previous CRAF run didn't have this issue. It could be possible that I'm contaminating one of the NTCs when I'm pipetting because my hands have been shaking slightly while I pipette. Hopefully I can run this one again without the contamination in the future. 

7 1 2015 CRAF 3 qPCR

Today I reran the CRAF qPCR to create another replicate with no contamination issues in the NTCs.

Primers:

1636	CRAF1_FWD	AGCAGGGCATCAAACTCTCC	JH	5/21/2015	20	55		O.lurida	TNF receptor-associated factor 3 (EC 6.3.2.-) (CD40 receptor-associated factor 1) (CRAF1) (TRAFAMN)	Q60803
1635	CRAF1_REV	ACAAGTCGCACTGGCTACAA	JH	5/21/2015	20	55		O.lurida	TNF receptor-associated factor 3 (EC 6.3.2.-) (CD40 receptor-associated factor 1) (CRAF1) (TRAFAMN)	Q60803

Reagent Table:

	Volume	Reactions X58
Ssofast Evagreen MM	10	580
FWD Primer	0.5	29
REV Primer	0.5	29
Nuclease Free H2O	8	464
cDNA	1

1. Added reagents from greatest to least volume
2. Vortexed
3. Centrifuged briefly
4. Pipetted 19 ul Master Mix to each tube
5. Pipetted appropriate cDNA sample to each tube
6. Centrifuged plate at 2000 rpm for 1 minute
7. Ran Program Below

Program:

Step	Temperature	Time
Initiation	95 C	10 min
Elongation	95 C	30 sec
	60 C	1 min
Read
	72 C	30 sec
Read
Repeat Elongation 39 times
Termination	95 C	1 min
	55 C	1 sec
Melt Curve Manual ramp 0.2C per sec Read 0.5 C	55 - 95 C	30 sec
	21 C	10 min
End

Plate Layout:

1	2	3	4	5	6	7
DNased 42215 HC1	DNased 42215 NC1	DNased 42215 SC1	DNased 42215 HT1 1	DNased 42215 NT1 1	DNased 42215 ST1 1	NTC
DNased 42215 HC2	DNased 42215 NC2	DNased 42215 SC2	DNased 42215 HT1 2	DNased 42215 NT1 2	DNased 42215 ST1 2	NTC
DNased 42215 HC3	DNased 42215 NC3	DNased 42215 SC3	DNased 42215 HT1 3	DNased 42215 NT1 3	DNased 42215 ST1 3	NTC
DNased 42215 HC4	DNased 42215 NC4	DNased 42215 SC4	DNased 42215 HT1 4	DNased 42215 NT1 4	DNased 42215 ST1 4	NTC
DNased 42215 HC5	DNased 42215 NC5	DNased 42215 SC5	DNased 42215 HT1 5	DNased 42215 NT1 5	DNased 42215 ST1 5
DNased 42215 HC6	DNased 42215 NC6	DNased 42215 SC6	DNased 42215 HT1 6	DNased 42215 NT1 6	DNased 42215 ST1 6
DNased 42215 HC7	DNased 42215 NC7	DNased 42215 SC7	DNased 42215 HT1 7	DNased 42215 NT1 7	DNased 42215 ST1 7
DNased 42215 HC8	DNased 42215 NC8	DNased 42215 SC8	DNased 42215 HT1 8	DNased 42215 NT1 8	DNased 42215 ST1 8

Results:

All Samples

NTCs

THere looks like there very very minor amplification in 1 of the 4 NTCs but its so little that it doesn't register when comparing it to the rest of the samples. This is probably just a random error at this point. I'm re running the TLR replicate to hopefully get a clean TLR sample as well. 

You can see the raw data file here.