Author Archives: kubu4

PCR – C.pugetti DNA from 20090513 & 20090526

This is a repeat of yesterday’s PCR with a fresh working stock in hopes of eliminating the source of contamination seen in the negative control yesterday.

Lane 1 – 100bp ladder

Lane 2 – 5/13 DNA

Lane 3 – 5/26 DNA

Lane 4 – Empty

Lane 5 – H2O

Results: Same problem as yesterday. Water sample is contaminated. This suggests that the primer stocks are contaminated. Likely due to the use of non-sterile, “old” TE for reconstitution of the primer stocks. Will re-order them and reconstitute them sterily.

RNA Isolation – Abalone Dg Project

Isolated RNA using the MoBio RNA PowerSoil Kit according to protocol from the following samples:

06:6-45

06:6-49

06:6-50

06:6-51

06:6-52

08:4-6

08:4-9

08:4-10

Results: RNA looks fabulous (as always from the PowerSoil kit). Will DNase treat the samples tomorrow.

PCR – C.pugetti DNA from 20090513 & 20090526

Performed PCR as set up here using universal bacterial 16s primers (sequences provided by Sara Kelly).

Lane 1 – 100bp ladder

Lane 2- 5/13 DNA

Lane 3 – 5/26 DNA

Lane 4 – H2O

Results: Contamination in the water sample. Hopefully this is just bad technique (never thought I’d say that about myself) and not general, bacterial contamination in the primer stocks, since the stocks (nor the PCR rxns) were prepared steriley. Will repeat.

DNA Gel – JGI QC check of C. pugetti DNA from 20090526

Lane 1 – 15ng standard (5uL)

Lane 2 – 31ng standard (5uL)

Lane 3 – 63ng standard (5uL)

Lane 4 – Marker 2 (5uL)

Lane 5 – C. pugetti DNA (5uL: 4uL + 1uL 5x dye)

Lane 6 – Marker 3 (5uL)

Lane 7 – 125ng standard

Lane 8 – 250ng standard (5uL)

Lane 9 – 500ng standard (5uL)

Results: Looks great! Will run PCR using universal 16s primers for sequencing.

gDNA Isolation – C. pugetti (from 20090518)

Followed JGI “Bacterial genomic DNA isolation using CTAB” protocol(Word doc) with the following notes/changes.

Two, 1L cultures were transferred to 4 total jars (~500mL in each jar) for centrifugation. Jars had been briefly washed with 95% EtOH prior to use.

Cells were pelleted in Sorval T21 using a bucket rotor for 30mins., 4200RPM, 25C.

Supe was removed and all four pellets were resuspended with a total of 10mL of TE.

OD600 = ~2.1, so added an additional 10mL of TE.

OD600 = ~1.2, so proceeded with procedure.

Due to volume of the prep, the sample was split into two, 50mL centrifuge tubes (washed with 95% EtOH prior to use) prior to the addition of 5M NaCl.

Disaster strikes! Turns out the tubes being used were not resistant to chloroform. This was realized after spinning at 18,000RPM, 25C 10mins in a Sorval SL-50T rotor in the Sorval T21 centrifuge.

However…

I recovered the aqueous phase anyway, as it was still contained in the tube and had no contact with the rotor surface(s). Due to a subsequent phenol:chloroform:IAA step, I split the aqueous phase into 24 x 1.5mL snap cap tubes and proceeded according to protocol. The final DNA pellet, prior to resuspension were combined from all the tubes into a single 1.5mL snap cap tube in a final volume of 400uL of TE.

Results: DNA from today looks good with excellent yield. DNA from 20090513 doesn’t look as nice AND the concentration doesn’t jive with the QC gel that was run on 20090513. Will run out on gel according to JGI protocol to evaluate quality further.

DNA Methylation Test – Gigas site gDNA (BB & DH) from 20090515

Used BB & DH samples #11-17 for procedure. Followed Epigentek’s protocol. My calcs for dilutions/solutions needed are here. All solutions were made fresh before using, except for Diluted GU1 which was made at the beginning of the procedure and stored on ice in a 50mL conical wrapped in aluminum foil. Used 100ng total (50ng/uL) of each sample gDNA. No standards for a standard curve based on speaking with Mac.

WELL SAMPLE WELL SAMPLE
A01 BB11 A02 DH11
B01 BB12 B02 DH12
C01 BB13 C02 DH13
D01 BB14 D02 DH14
E01 BB15 E02 DH15
F01 BB16 F02 DH16
G01 BB17 G02 DH17
H01 Pos. Control H02 Blank

Results: Above is the graph of the results. Although it’s only a small difference between the two sites, it is statistically significant. The calcs for this graph can be found here (Excel file). It should be noted that this graph was generated using estimated values from the standard curve provided in the manufacturer’s protocol. This was done because 1) I did not run standards to generate my own curve and 2) calculating the “% methylation” not using the formula that utilizes the standard curve was giving ridiculously high values (e.g. 350%).

Here is the raw data generated by the plate reader for a 1s read (Excel file) and a 0.1s (Excel file) read. Both reads have nearly identical values.

RNA Isolation – Abalone Dg Project samples

Isolated RNA from Abalone Dg samples (see below) using MoBio RNA PowerSoil Kit according to protocol. RNA was stored @ -80C.

Results: RNA quality looks great, as usual. Sample 06:6-44 has a very low yield, but was to be expected due to very small amount of starting tissue.